Outsource Software Development to a Remote Dedicated Team in India Hourly or Monthly

At Empiric Infotech LLP it is $2,000 USD per month per dedicated developer for 160 to 172 hours of full-time, exclusive work, billed monthly upfront, with a 7-day risk-free trial. In the EU the same seat is EUR 2,000 per month, and in Australia it is AUD $3,000 per month. Hourly engagements are $15 per hour for standard development and $25 per hour for AI work (AUD $25 and AUD $40 in Australia). There is no placement fee, no markup on hours, and no minimum term.

An offshore software development company builds and maintains software for clients in a different country and time zone from its own engineering team. Empiric Infotech LLP is an offshore software development company headquartered in Surat, India, with a US office in Bridgeville, Pennsylvania, serving clients in the USA, Europe and Australia. We work as a dedicated team on a flat monthly rate rather than as a fixed-price project vendor, so the same named developers stay on your product month after month.

Offshore developer rates vary widely by country and vendor, so the only rate we will state as fact is ours: $2,000 USD per month for a dedicated developer working 160 to 172 hours, which is roughly $11.63 to $12.50 an effective hour, or $15 per hour standard and $25 per hour for AI work if you prefer hourly billing. That rate already includes senior team lead code review, functional testing and project management, which many outsourcing vendors bill as separate line items.

Our developers work 09:30 to 19:30 IST, Monday to Friday, which is where the 160 to 172 billable hours a month comes from. European teams get five to seven live hours a day, from their morning into mid-afternoon, Australian teams get two to three hours across their afternoon on AEST and about five in Perth, and US East and Central teams get a live morning window followed by a full offshore day of shipped work landing before their afternoon ends. US Mountain and Pacific teams run on a standing morning call plus asynchronous pull-request review. If a live nine-to-five overlap with a US time zone is a hard requirement, an India-based partner is the wrong fit and we will say so on the scoping call.

You do, from day one. Your developer works inside your GitHub or GitLab organisation and your own AWS, Azure, GCP, DigitalOcean or Hetzner account, so the code, the infrastructure, the domain and the data are in your accounts throughout the engagement. We sign your MSA, NDA, SOW and DPA, and a W-8BEN-E is on file for US clients. There is nothing to transfer or claw back when an engagement ends.

Within 48 hours of sign-off. The sequence is a scoping call of thirty to forty-five minutes, a written scope and team proposal back within 24 hours, then onboarding into your repository, cloud account and tracker. The agreed first deliverable ships inside week one, reviewed and tested by a senior team lead.

A senior team lead, and it is included in the $2,000 monthly rate. Every change goes through code review, functional testing against the agreed scope, and a sign-off before it reaches you. We do not bill a separate QA seat. On a multi-developer engagement that same lead keeps the team aligned. If you have your own review process, your developer works inside it.

The first 7 days are risk-free: if the fit is wrong, you get a full refund. After that the engagement is billed monthly with 7 days notice to stop, with no auto-renewal, no minimum term and no penalty. If you want a different developer rather than an exit, we swap the seat inside the 7-day window at no cost.

No. Fixed-price bidding pushes both sides to argue about scope instead of shipping, and it turns every roadmap change into a change order. We sell a dedicated developer or a small dedicated team on a rolling monthly rate, or hours if your budget is scoped that way. You re-prioritise the backlog whenever you like, and the price does not move.

Yes, and a large share of outsourcing engagements start that way. Feature work, refactors, performance work, migrations, upgrades and clearing a bug backlog on a codebase somebody else wrote. We will read the repository first and tell you honestly what we see, including if the honest answer is that a rewrite would cost you less than another year of patching.